It is interesting to note that Pearson claims UKIP is for 'individual thinkers'. What planet is he living on? In UKIP being an 'individual thinker' can get you into serious trouble. Just ask Del Young, David Abbott or Eric Edmond!
We also note that the noble Lord is still trying to deny that he offered to disband UKIP in exchange for the Tories agreeing to a referendum on the EU. Silly man. Trying to spin such nonsense won't change the fact!
Is Lord Pearson suffering from foot in mouth disease? It seems so. But at least he has his wife to watch out for gaffes!
JAN MOIR talks to Baron Pearson of Rannoch, the gloriously eccentric and accident-prone new head of UKIP
29th December 2009
Oh, Lordy, Lordy. This is not going exactly to plan, is it? Lord Pearson of Rannoch, the newly elected leader of the UK Independence Party has had, to say the least, a rocky few weeks in office.
He had only been in the job 24 hours when he ignited a row that still threatens to tear UKIP apart, he has been drawn into the expenses debacle and then there is the small matter of allegations of his involvement with a corrupt South American regime.
'Yes, yes, yes. It has been an interesting time. Not exactly a bed of roses, no,' he says, with a cheerful nod.
On his first day in office, Lord Pearson annoyed many in the Right-wing, anti-Europe UKIP by saying that if the Tories promised a referendum on Britain's continued membership of the EU, he would disband his own party.
'A rather original approach to leadership,' as Glenys Kinnock dryly noted in the House of Lords recently.
It has also come to light that Pearson has received £100,000 over six years by claiming that his £3.6million house in London was his second home.
'For tax purposes. That's not fibbing or anything. You know, the point I find impossible to get over to critics is what I have actually given up to do this,' he sighs, estimating that entering the House of Lords at Margaret Thatcher's behest 20 years ago has impoverished him to the tune of £200,000 a year in lost earnings.
He says he is also losing money by selflessly leading UKIP. If he carries on down this spiral, he'll be as poor as a church mouse.
Or perhaps not. Pearson's critics would argue that, to the contrary, all he has done is indulge himself by funding his pet hobby; politics.
And as a millionaire insurance broker, he could well afford to take the drop anyway. 'No, I am not rich enough,' he says.
He insists that all he owns is a London town house, a moor, a deer forest and a 12,000-acre country estate in the Highlands, plus a share portfolio worth around £2.5million and a pension fund with 'about' £600,000 in it.
'And that's it!' he cries. 'The house is worth £1.2million. Scotland is probably worth about £3million or £4million - but not unless you sell it. And then what do you do? Nothing? Lie on a beach? Oh, everyone is so anti-rich these days, aren't they?
'Andrew Neil was going on about my wealth the other day when I was on his television programme. I should have said: "Mr Neil, if being rich was a crime in this country, then you would have been behind bars years ago."'
Why didn't you? 'I'm just not quick enough, I'm afraid.' How glad the uber-modern Conservatives must be that Pearson left their party years ago!
At a time when David Cameron - rightly or wrongly - seems obsessed with de-toffing his party, the last thing he wants is someone like the flamboyant anti-Europe, pro-hunting, outspoken millionaire Malcolm Everard MacLaren Pearson, Baron Pearson of Rannoch, rocking the careful carpentry of his egalitarian boat.
Small of stature, ruddy of cheek but loud of opinion, Pearson is the kind of unreconstructed Old Etonian dinosaur - 'My nickname at Eton was Malc The Knife,' he says, without a blush - who must give the Tory leader nightmares.
He even says yah! when he means yes; practically a hanging offence in the modern political world.
'At least I am who I am,' says Pearson. 'David Cameron has given up shooting and hunting and he has resigned from White's. I mean, it is absurd.
'He is trying to show that he is something that he isn't - or isn't something that he is, let's put it that way. I am not going to do that. I can't be bothered to pretend. If people don't like it, then tough,' he adds, brushing the arm of his charcoal pinstripe suit.
Even at the age of 67 he still has his suits made by the Eton tailors Tom Brown because: 'I am a very awkward shape; low-slung, with thick legs and rather short arms.'
His shirts are handmade for the same reason.
'From Turnbull & Asser, I'm afraid. Whoops, there goes another headline,' he says.
We meet in Pearson's South London home, a perfect Georgian town house in a perfect Georgian square and practically next door to one of the original 18th century sites of the House of Bedlam, where fashionable Londoners used to come to stare at the inmates. However, this is not Pearson's famously flipped home; this is the one he moved to in 2007 to save money.
Lord Pearson and his third wife, the much younger, poetically named Caroline St Vincent Rose, 'downsized' here from his much grander, Grade II listed stucco house in Belgravia, situated in a square where Ian Fleming and Michael Portillo once lived. Part of the £2million the Pearsons made on the property deal was ploughed back into the running of Lord Pearson's ruinously expensive Scottish estate.
'The thing about a deer forest,' he says, 'is that the income can't possibly meet the expenditure.'
It must be appalling. 'Yah. However, it is worth it. We have a lot of people to stay in Scotland in the summer. And a lot of them wouldn't get that sort of holiday if they didn't come.'
Who are they, orphans? 'Important people. We refresh a lot of really good people who come to stay,' he says. 'People we put together who wouldn't otherwise meet. People who do really good work and of whom you would approve.'
The ground floor of the Pearsons' London home is all pale wood and white walls, with light pouring in from a conservatory-type extension to the rear. I count at least nine oil portraits of groupings of short-haired German pointers; a rapt audience of adoring doggy eyes which track your every move around the room.
'That's Jock, that's Fred who ran away, that's Suchard [named after the chocolate], that's Jock Junior, that's Fred's grandfather. ..' says Pearson, going on to point out the hunting dogs who live on his Scottish estate in a manner of which they would no doubt approve.
In the dining area, there is also a huge landscape of gloomy Glencoe, featuring some Highland cattle grazing in the foreground.
'Oh, that's just Malcolm! He always likes to imagine he is in Scotland,' says Lady Pearson.
Willowy and rather lovely, she pads around in her tight green jeans and furry Uggs, keeping a watchful eye on proceedings. She has no intention, she says, of being a 'political wife', but she wants to support her husband as much as she can.
'This has been his absolute obsession for years,' she explains.
How does she think it is going so far? 'Interesting,' she says, and puts the kettle on.
For his part, the leader of UKIP feels that he has three main problems.
'Expenses, disband and Costa Rica,' he says, cheerfully counting them off on his fingers. 'Costa Rica, disband and expenses. Disband is my big one. I mean, did I really say the word "disband"? I guess I must have done. Bit of a cock-up, really.'
What he actually meant, he now says, is that his party would merely stand aside at the next General Election to avoid any potential split of the Tory vote and to help put David Cameron's Conservatives in a more powerful position.
In return, they would get their beloved referendum, and once they got that, they would reform themselves once more. Disband didn't come into it.
'I didn't think I was suggesting anything particularly naughty as far as the membership was concerned. If we got the referendum, we are confident that we would win it.
'Then we would be out of the EU and there would be a complete re-alignment of British politics. Perhaps even the start of a new party, like the Common Sense Party, co-operating with activists and real people in all the other parties.'
The Common Sense Party? 'Yes, something like that. That is just an idea.'
Then there is Costa Rica. Malc The Knife faces fresh questions about bribery allegations against his company Pearson Webb Springbett - the insurance brokers he co-founded 45 years ago - when it was operating in Costa Rica in the 1990s.
Pearson sold the company last year, but has been helping an official investigation into allegations that PWS had bribed the then president of Costa Rica while allegedly overcharging the country for its insurance premiums.
In his defence, Pearson has said his company operated by the normal South American business practices adopted by all international insurance companies at the time and that PWS had done nothing wrong.
'I knew my weak spots before I became leader of the party,' says Pearson, who also courted controversy earlier this year when he invited Dutch Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders to show the anti-Islam film Fitna before the House of Lords.
In the end, Wilders was prevented from entering the UK on the instructions of the then Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith. In response, Pearson accused the Government of 'appeasing' militant Islam. Now he is cheered by other recent news from Europe.
'God bless the Swiss. Look at what they did the other day; they knocked out the wretched minarets. Wonderful!' he cries.
At other moments, he just sounds rather terrifyingly like the major in Fawlty Towers and he concedes: 'I am a sort of loony. A rebel, a maverick. I was brought up in the wilderness of Rannoch which teaches you to think for yourself.
'I spent all my school holidays there, wandering the hills and that made me an original thinker. I think I am even cursed with a little vision. No, not a seer. I wouldn't go as far as that.
'But as soon as I read the Treaties of Rome, I did see that this was a project heading in the wrong direction. I saw it very, very clearly.'
Pearson was elected to office when former UKIP leader Nigel Farage, who is also a member of the European Parliament for the South-East, resigned in September to concentrate on his efforts to become an MP at Westminster.
'He is a Derby winner and I am a carthorse who puts his hooves in it sometimes, I'm afraid,' says Pearson.
'Be careful what you are saying, darling,' calls his wife.
The Pearsons married in 1997, after knowing each other 'for ages'. They have no children together, but he has three daughters; one from his first marriage to Francesca Frua de Angeli and two from his second marriage to the Hon. Mary Charteris.
His middle daughter has Down's syndrome and lives in a sheltered community. Over the years, Pearson has done much campaigning and political work on behalf of those with mental health problems.
'Being divorced twice has been very sad, but I remain on good terms with both former wives and our children. I don't make a very good husband, obviously, although Caroline and I are perfectly happy. I'm not all bad, though, am I?' he wonders. 'I do a few a chores.'
Such as? 'Such as the breakfast washing-up when we are in Scotland. I cook a bit. I make the finest cheese omelette in the land. I put the rubbish out.'
As if to emphasise his lordly domestic credentials, he has a minor fit when his wife serves coffee in mugs.
'A mug! Haven't we got a cup and saucer for our guest?' he cries, before absent-mindedly helping himself to one of my biscuits.
'Oh, I am not really a politician,' he sighs. 'To be honest, I did not want to be UKIP leader, but I came to see that I ought to try to do it.
'When I looked at the likely contenders for the leadership - ('Darling! I said be careful,' says Caroline) - 'I worried that if one or two of them won it, it would be very difficult to hold the party together because of factions and personal divides. UKIP is not for sheep, you know, it is not for lemmings. It is a party for individual thinkers and strong characters.'
Indeed. Three years ago, David Cameron described it as a party of fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists . . .
'A somewhat puerile statement and churlishly rude of him, I think,' he says. 'But it helped us, in a way. It helped to bring a lot of people into the party.' It did?
In many ways I can't help liking this terrifyingly accident-prone, self-consciously eccentric aristocrat. However, the question is, will anyone take this seer of a peer Malc The Knife, his ideas and his wealth, seriously?
'If you are wealthy, you are, apparently, rich and evil these days. My message to everyone is that, yes, I did go to Eton, but my father died in debt. I am where I am today because of what I made myself. So get out and do it yourself, for goodness' sake.'
And what is he going to get up and do for the rest of the day?
The League of Empire Loyalists was formed in 1954. It campaigned for the preservation of white supremacy over the "Commonwealth".
It was formed by disgruntled Tories, in an attempt to influence Conservative Party policy (where have we heard that one before?).
It is generally remembered for its neo-Nazi associations - Colin Jordan, the leader of the British National Socialist Movement was a prominent member, as was John Tyndall, the founder of the BNP.
Now it gets interesting.... again, Junius is privy to conversations in London clubs. Not the East India this time - we never really liked it there. It is shabby, and the tatty old bar is frequented by smelly pipe smokers! No, this time to the Carlton Club, that bastion of conservatism.
Discussion a few nights ago centered around the League of Empire Loyalists, and a particular faction, that fancied itself to be a part of Gladio, the Cold war resistance organisation. Our source, formerly a member of the League, now an elderly Tory businessman, told us about this faction. "A bunch of military fantasists - always totally pissed, and centred on the TA. Real weekend warriors! They fancied that they would defend Blighty from the Commies and the Wogs when the balloon went up!" Apparently, even Jordan and the other Nazis thought this lot to be bonkers.
Why do we mention this?
Because one of the leading lights of this clique was the father of a senior UKIP MEP.
There has been been some discussion of this in the past, but now our friend in the Carlton Club has really allowed us to open this can of worms.
A disgruntled Tory faction starting something new in order to influence Conservative Party policy? Drunken fantasists? Closet racism? Does it ring any bells? It seems it runs in the family!
We at Junius note that the usual EUKIP liars and cheats are still losing sleep over the identity of Junius. Indeed, we have recently been the subject of some discussion on the British Democracy Forum.
The list is getting increasingly longer with John West, Robin Page, Gary Cartwright and Adrian Muldew being added to the ever growing list of suspects.
You may recall that Mark Croucher accused Piers Merchant of being Junius. Piers has now been dead for several months and yet strangely we are still here. We note that Croucher has yet to apologise to the Merchant family for publishing his lies.
Croucher currently posts on the British Democracy Forum as 'Skeptyk'. In a recent post he once again accused Gary Cartwright of being Junius. You may recall that Gary used to work for UKIP as a researcher.
Here is Gary's response:
Exactly what am I being accused of now?
In 2005, before the General Election, I was tasked with doing an audit of candidates. A man I will call "Mr S" had very strong BNP connections. I reported this to Farage. He told me to "drop it". More about this later....
I was accused of leaking information to Greg Lance Watkins once, by David Lott and Nigel Farage. When as a result of my own investigations into the matter I showed them that only they (and Gawain Towler) had that the relevant information at the time it was leaked, it very suddenly became "well, actually, its not something we are here to talk about". Well. at least I had found the leak...!
I was accused of selling a story about Farage's son to the Sunday Times. When I produced a letter from the ST to confirm that I was not the source, the leadership did not want to look at it... the lie had served its purpose. I lost my job as a result of that lie.
Having found a new position in the European Parliament, I was then accused of being a member of the BNP, a cross-dresser, a closet gay, and - most insultingly - of having lied about my service record. This all came from the aforementioned "Mr S" and one of his chums. The allegations turned into threats, and I had to call in the police. The harassment then stopped. Mr S's chum was an ex-con, and so they probably realised it was a good time to stand down on this one.
I was then informed that a certain UKIP MEP had been calling members in his region, and was alleging that I, and others, had been recruited into UKIP to destabilise the party. Apparently, I am an MI5/MI6 agent.
Then, whilst I was subsequently working as a journalist in Brussels, my editor was viciously attacked on the platform of a train station by a young lady working for in the offices of the UKIP Brussels clique, who objected to a story "Gary Cartwright had written". I didn't write that story... it showed me the measure of these folks. Idiots, one and all.
It gets better.
I was present when a young journalist was physically attacked by a UKIP MEP in a Brussels bar.
I was attacked by a young intern for being "Junius". His behaviour was appalling. When Piers Merchant was "exposed" as Junius, did I get an apology? No way... again, it shows us the measure of these people.
Piers is no longer with us, but Junius is still active. Has an apology been issued to Piers' family? You can guess... by now you will know the measure of these vile people.
I walked past Farage's office a while back - his pa, who I once shared an office with, was there - I try to get on with everybody, and so I greeted him. I was verbally abused in the most obscene manner, and jabbed with an umbrella.
Gary's excellent post gives just a few examples of the serious problems within UKIP. To state that the corrupt and dishonest gain preferment in UKIP while the decent and honest are driven out by a corrupt leadership would be a colossal understatement!
Junius was delighted to be privy to a drunken conversation in the East India Club… The truth about why Nigel Farage resigned the UKIP leadership can now be told.
The somewhat noisy tantrum thrown by Marta ‘the Martyr’ Andreason at a meeting of the NEC, which culminated in her resignation as party treasurer, was just the start of a series of events that spelled the beginning of the end for Farage’s grip on UKIP.
Even before she confronted Farage and Nuttall with what she had found in the books, she had spoken to more than one of the party’s donors. Stuart Wheeler, whose “hot and cold” attitude towards UKIP owes more to Tory tactics than to his own beliefs, was furious. Then when the Elcom verdict came in, he issued Farage with an ultimatum – “Go now and put Pearson in, or else!”
So Farage obliged, but not before ensuring that his replacement vehicle, a pan-European political party, was taking shape.
Immediately Pearson was anointed, Farage went to work on his “scorched earth” policy. His press officer, Bridget Rowe, began to plant stories in the press on a daily basis – tax dodges, Tory deals, etc, etc.
Now Farage has fulfilled the demands of the all-important UKIP/Tory donor, ensured a safe berth in Brussels when it all goes pear shaped, and he leaves UKIP looking like a mess, (which of course would never have happened if he was still at the helm!)
You have to admire the man, he handled it well. If only his mates hadn’t got bladdered and talked too much at the bar.
Incidentally, Marta also talked to one of her old chums in Paul Van Buitenen’s office. PvB hates hypocrites, and Farage can expect some bad times in Brussels as a result! Cheers, Marta.
Italy's influential Northern League Party has stood out over the past decade for its particular knack in finding new (and not-so-new) ways of offending people based on country of origin and color of skin. In 2003, Umberto Bossi, founder of the party, which once espoused separatism, told an interviewer that police should open fire on the boatloads of undocumented Africans arriving on Italian shores, calling the would-be immigrants "bingo-bongos." Other Northern League pols have proposed everything from separate trains for immigrants to banning the building of new mosques and even prohibiting the serving of kebabs and other non-Italian food in city centers.
The latest swipe by the Northern League attempts some kind of holiday spirit. The league-led city council in Coccaglio, a small town east of Milan, has launched a two-month sweep — from Oct. 25 to Dec. 25 — to ferret out foreigners without proper residency permits. It has been dubbed Natale Bianco, or "White Christmas."
Claudio Abiendi, a longtime Lega Nord member who leads security policy on the city council, told the daily La Repubblica that he came up with the initiative as a way "to start cleaning things up" in Coccaglio, a town of 7,000 with some 1,500 immigrant residents. "For me, Christmas isn't the celebration of hospitality, but rather of Christian tradition and our identity," he said. Abiendi also told the paper that approximately half of the 150 inspections already carried out turned up people who no longer had a right to reside in Italy. He said he would report them to national authorities.
The city council office is responding to requests for interviews with a press release denying any racist intent, noting that the Natale Bianco moniker was not an official public designation. The impromptu local census "was born to know the real number of foreign-born citizens present in Coccaglio so as to better manage the economic resources destined for integration projects." Local officials say the measure follows a national policy set forth by Italy's Interior Minister, Roberto Maroni, a member of the Northern League, to give local administrators more authority in monitoring the residency status of foreigners.
The Northern League, founded in 1991 on a platform to separate the richer northern regions from the rest of Italy, is as strong as it has ever been. It is now a key ally in Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi's majority in Parliament after garnering 10% of support in the last national election on a campaign focused on deepening worries about crime and the economy. Last week, the league floated (but then withdrew) a measure in Italy's budget bill that would have capped unemployment benefits for foreign-born workers.
Both the economic scapegoating of immigrants and the vision of the league's White Christmas irk the Comunita di Sant'Egidio, an influential Catholic lay group that defends immigrant rights. "The insults and rhetoric help to exploit uncertainty and create political consensus," says Mario Marazziti, Sant'Egidio's spokesman. "But in the end, it is against the national interest. Italy is in demographic decline, and the only real chance is to work to integrate immigrants, who are the last hope for the country to start to grow again. All the rest just creates conflict and puts off resolving this crisis."
Indeed, even as the Northern League continues to cite Christian themes in its opposition to a growing Muslim minority, Pope Benedict XVI on Nov. 27 presented the annual message for the upcoming World Day of Migrants and Refugees. "Jesus' words resound in our hearts," he said. " 'I was a stranger and you welcomed me,' as, likewise, the central commandment he left us: to love God with all our heart, with all our soul and with all our mind, and to associate this with love of neighbor." Now that is a different kind of Christmas spirit.
The Lega Nord are members of UKIP’s Freedom and Democracy Group.
Lega Nord even have a paramilitary wing known as the greenshirts (camicie verdi).
To say that some of UKIP’s MEPs are unhappy joining forces with the LD would be an understatement. Some have already threatened to leave the group.
It is interesting to note that the odious Paul Nuttall - who would not even stay in the same room as Nick Griffin - is more than happy to embrace his European racist, homophobic and anti-semitic allies. The words stinking hypocrite spring to mind.
One wonders what Mark Croucher - self-proclaimed anti-fascist warrior, Searchlight supporter and EFD Press Officer - makes of all this?
Perhaps someone should report him to Searchlight for his pro-fascist activities?
Simon Muir was the organiser of the UKIP Bristol conference back in 2004.
This is what he now thinks of UKIP:
Start with UKIP. When you have a set that might be a viable opposition or government pro tem, then the others become the target.
Why do I get so exercised about them?
Because they are so FFFFing USELESS! And they need not be, apart from the corruption, and Farage-the-puppeteer messing up everything because he only sees intellectual equals as a threat.
Only the blind or stupid would waste time on them presently, and the sad thing is that they don't care about the depth of the betrayal, because nobody in the party wants to be honest about their true position.
Games to play in UKIP:
- Spot the Economist. First person to score 0 is the winner.
- Spot the Politician. Same rules as above except the scoring is 1.
- Hunt the strategic plan. Hint: look down the back of the sofa and in Farage's trouser pocket: it can't be anywhere else...
- Beat the Bishop, er MEP: Sit him/her in a chair and hit him once with a rolled up newspaper for every bit of wasted expense and irrelevant posturing in the EP. Stop when the police arrive, or your arm gets too tired.
It's twelve years since I was persuaded that UKIP were the only hope for the future. Since then, in actual measurable terms, all that's happened is that the party's grown fat on EU handouts, and, under Farage, reneged on its constitutional promise about withdrawal etc. With one or two honourable exceptions, such as Alan Woods and Denis Brookes, nobody has come even close to winning a real, FPTP, election. Such is the REAL impact the party has made.
As for claims they frighten the Tories: they evidently don't bother Cameron - his leadership is arguably more pro-EU than even John Major's cabinet was, and he's just slammed the door on a referendum. He's obviously terrified UKIP will steal Tory seats, not!
Insiders suspect too, that there are enough people who know where the buried UKIP bodies are to trash the party's election campaign. Tom Wise probably won't be the last UKIP MEP to have his collar felt: any manipulative anti-UKIP functionary would be saving the best till last.
Be sure that any dirt the Tory press have to spread around won't be used now, when UKIP might just have time to recover before the vote. It will 'surface' two weeks before polling day, so that every UKIP candidate spends a fortnight defending the indefensible, before their inevitable electoral wipeout.
Do I sound angry & betrayed? You bet. The likes of Ken Clarke make their betrayal of the country no secret, in a sort of perverse honesty. You can hate them but you cannot misunderstand them.
UKIP, in contrast have taken the trust, time and effort (and money) of thousands of people like me and wasted it.
On that theme, what about the poor saps picking up the HUGE bill for UKIP's rudeness to the Electoral Commission? How many UKIP people know the matter could have been settled out of court for LESS than £20,000? It might even have cost nothing at all, had simple courtesy been observed from the start. There is a timeline and detail of the whole farrago in the public domain, for anyone who cares to look.
Let's think: would it be better to spend £1m campaigning, or to hand it to a Labour government as a fine? Nope. It beats me too.
Meanwhile, UKIP's words remain weasely and they evidently have NO PLAN, and NO IDEA how to actually DO what they claim they want to do.
Oh, and should the best anti-EU defence we can muster in these islands be the racist thuggery of the BNP? Ten years ago, UKIP's membership was climbing and the BNP's diminishing. What has happened since, and why?
I'd like UKIP GONE as fast as possible, so we can start again with something true and honest, that people might actually ELECT.
More from Simon:
Cameron's pitch will be simple:
"Vote Tory to save the country; a vote for either of the other two means you'll get five more years of the same communist destructiveness."
They'll circle the wagons and make no direct reference to UKIP unless forced to. The 'do you want to split the vote?' argument will keep the faithful on-board, PRECISELY BECAUSE UKIP IS SO USELESS.
If there was any risk of a decent campaign being run, or a shred of joined-up and sensible policy, UKIP might make headway. But there isn't and it won't. A vote for UKIP is simply a wasted vote. You might just as well scribble profanities on the ballot paper, for all the good it will actually achieve.
And anyway, as I said, the arm of the law is long and tends to grab people at most inconvenient moments...
Where is the EGM to put the party right? Why aren't people demanding Farage personally pays for the court case? Where is the plan? What are the fat MEPs doing TODAY to get the UK out of the EU (hint: are they on expenses in Brussels or fighting the battle here, where it actually matters?).
WHAT SINGLE ADVANTAGE HAS THE INDEPENDENCE MOVEMENT GAINED FROM UKIP MEPs GOING TO BRUSSELS, ON ANY OCCASION, EVER?
The battle is here, not at enemy HQ. How could anyone ever think otherwise?
We would like to thank one of UKIP's MEPs for passing this on to us. The spelling and spacing mistakes are as the original.
Considering how much Farage makes as an MEP we would have thought that he could have at least found someone able to write something that looks competent. Doesn't he realise how unprofessional such a badly written email makes him look? Or is he just too drunk to care?
Dear Hannah Charnock
Thank you for your message, to Nigel Farage, about the deterioratingsituation, in several parts of Africa, and recommending action by theUN, the EU and HMG, to remedy this.
The problem is that the UN, the EU, HMG - and several otherEU-governments - together with the IMF and the WTO, HAVE been takingaction, in Africa, for decades, with the result we now see, and thequestion arises whether this battery of powers and supra-nationalorganisation s is, under its current management, a suitable custodian, orwhether it serves rather the great financial interests, which underpinit, at the expense of peace and genuine development in the Third World.
The EU's predatory "Economic Partnership Agreements" (EPA's) the IMF'smanipulative loan-conditions and the UN's undisciplined mercenaries,should be replaced, in UKIP's view, by equitable, conservational,development-agreements (such as the one proposed by Guyana) which couldwork to the benefit of all concerned, rather than - as with the presentarrangements - acting to coerce, bribe and de-stabilise, under the cloakof humanitarianism, woven by our media.
In many respects, this is not just UKIP's view, but that of severalcharities in the field, such as the World Development Movement.
In any event, UKIP's position, regarding the mooted EU-battlegroup forthe DCR, is conditioned essentially by the consideration that theEuropean Union lacks the democratic accountability necessary to avoidits becoming a fearsome autocracy, endangering freedom, justice,prosperity and peace, not just in Europe, or Africa, but in the world atlarge.
Douglas Denny - Himmler lookalike, Cuban boot fetishist and complete idiot - has been denying this week that Del Young was thrown out of UKIP after refusing to sign a letter confirming that he was not a member of UK First.
This is what Denny said:
Seems straightforward to me where the direct responsibility is for his not being in UKIP .. and it is not with UKIP. No "kicking-out" there ............and a far cry from the Eric Edmond lie that "He was effectively kicked out by Nuttall on false evidence".
Taken from the British Democracy Forum.
Rather inconveniently for Mr Denny we have a copy of the letter. Here is the text:
Dear Delroy Young
On 2nd March 2009 the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the (sic) passed the following motion:
“That the UK First Party (UKFP) be added to the NEC’s list of parties, membership of which is incompatible with UKIP membership under article 4.2 of the UKIP Constitution”.
It has been reported that you are a member of the UK First Party, which is committed to standing against the UK Independence Party in the forthcoming European Elections.
The NEC has now deemed that this is incompatible with UK Independence Party membership.
I am therefore asking you to sign the attached declaration confirming that you are not a member of the UK First Party, or that you have resigned from this party.
If you do not respond within 28 days I will take it that you longer wish to be a member of the UK Independence Party.
DECLARATION: I confirm that I am not currently a member of the UK First Party (UKFP)
End of letter. How appropriate that the letter was sent on April Fools Day!
FACT. Mr Denny is a liar.
FACT. Mr Young WAS never a member of UK First. He confirmed this to the odious Paul Nuttall during a rather heated telephone conversation. Despite this he was still thrown out.
So there you have it. No chance for an appeal or a hearing. Sounds very much like Stalin's Russia to us. But at least with Stalin you got a show trial. In UKIP Mr Young didn't even get that!
And Farage and Nuttall have the gall to claim that UKIP believes in democracy!
It is also interesting to note that Trevor Colman promised to join UK First if he was elected to Brussels. Perhaps someone should tell him that he has been an MEP since June. So why is he still in UKIP?
We at Junius are the first to praise those that deserve praise.
Gerard Batten turns down £ 19,000 increase in salary
Gerard Batten opted to remain on the old lower salary saying, “in a time of economic crisis when many of my constituents are in fear of losing their jobs, and when politicians’ reputations have never been lower, I did not feel it would be justified to take an increase in salary of almost £19,000 per annum.
Gerard said, “In times when people are fearful of losing their pensions how could I justify taking a pension that is not available to my constituents and for which I do not have to pay contributions?”.
But what about the likes of Nigel Farage and David Bannerman? They are too busy grabbing the extra cash to care about the people who elected them.
And what did happen to the £2 million Nigel claimed in expenses?
And what about the time Farage managed to spirit away £211,000 as 'miscellaneous expenses' from his Constituency Office?
And what about employing his wife on £30,000 a year? What DOES she do for that large sum?
And don’t forget the money raised by the Ashford Call Centre. Where did all that money go?
It is interesting to note that Michael McGough - serial liar and not the PPC for Harlow - has been highly critical of Batten's decision. He has said that Batten should have taken the money EVEN after voting against such a pay increase. Such is McGough's morality. He has also gone on record as saying "If you wish to be moral don't go to Brussels and Strasbourg period!"
Is that why Mr McGough was so keen to become an MEP himself? But at least it is nice to know what he really thinks about Mr Batten's moral standards!
As many will remember Ms Sinclaire is still committed to donating a third of her salary to UKIP. And what about the likes of Farage and Bannerman? They are too busy sticking their snouts in the trough to even consider following her example.
Nikki has had a hard time recently. Nigel Farage has behaved disgracefully towards her. He has made numerous threats about leaking stories to the press - including the story about her bankruptcy - unless she obeys His Highness.
Poor Nigel. Someone should have told that GLW had featured this non-story on his blog after a source VERY close to Farage leaked it to him in the hope that he would smear her. They failed.
A word of warning to Mr Farage. We know that Croucher - acting on YOUR orders - is behind these smears against her and we are not going to take the bait!
Does ANYONE out there still think that Nigel is a decent and honest man?
He is representing UKIP and their associates in the EFD. How ironic! The self-proclaimed anti-fascist warrior is now quite happy to represent fascists such as the Lega Nord! What will his friends at Searchlight say about this U-turn? Clearly Croucher's anti-fascist credentials are dictated by the size of his pay cheque!
And now for the latest news to reach Junius from the bars in Brussels………
Croucher has another job. He works for Farage. His job entails gathering ‘private information’ on UKIP MEPs, their employees and various senior UKIPPERS. This ‘private information’ can then be used against them if they dare to defy His Highness.
Farage is already threatening Nikki Sinclaire. Sadly for him the non-story about her bankruptcy had already been made public by GLW on his blog.
Farage’s attempt to control her failed miserably.
Farage is abusing his position as chairman of the EFD in order to deliberately smear a fellow MEP. This is in direct opposition to a guarantee given by Lord Pearson to several members deeply concerned by Farage's stranglehold on the party.
Lord Pearson would be wise to remove Farage at the earliest possible opportunity.
Just what kind of insanity is being nurtured in the office of Nigel Farage?
This extraordinary e-mail, sent from Farage's Brussels office on November 3rd, suggests a tortured and confused mind. Are UKIP members really happy that innocent members of the public, taking up their right to correspond with elected representatives, are receiving insane gibberish like this?
Is there a policy of poor grammar and spelling mistakes in Farage's office, or is the author of this missive simply poorly educated? Most people regard UKIP as a bit of a joke - this explains why!
From: FARAGE Nigel [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sent: 03 November 2009 08:41 To: DaDRL UK Subject: RE: Lethal Daytime Running Lights
Dear Mr Milnes Many thanks for writing to members of the EU's contemptible consultative assembly about this absurd , but cleverly sold and intentionally oppressive, piece of EU-legislation. Most of the EU-assembly's members are careerists, or fanatics, who would, and do, vote for anything the EU-Commission proposes, because they see the EU as their milch-cow for life and as an un-challengeable empire, which will give them ever greater privilege and wealth - if not any real power (which is all at the EU's Council, Commission and Court and in the EU's client-governments)UKIP's representatives, of course, did not vote for this nonsense about "day-time running lights".
They vote against the entire gamut of the Commission's wicked proposals, and are very glad to hear that they have your support, if only in this instance. The truth is, however, that you cannot pick and choose, which EU-legislation you will be subjected to. You can either support UKIP and a policy of scrapping it all, or you can support one of the other parties and, as Edward Heath put it, "swallow the lot".
Yours sincerely Andrew S. Reed Office of Nigel Farage, Brussels, www.ukip.org
Even in defeat the usual UKIP effluent continue with their lies and smears against Mr West. He has been accused of lying, secret meetings with Nick Griffin, being in the pay of the EU and so on.
It appears that Farage's sycophants and associated filth cannot accept that UKIP was in the wrong and was found guilty in a British court of law.
Will they never learn? They expel or drive out the decent and talented members. And yet they embrace the dishonest and the corrupt.
At the time of the original video posting only a handful of UKIP NEC members were prepared to demand some answers from Farage and Whitaker. This included Del Young.
Del Young had a stormy time on the NEC due to his insistence that the leadership LISTEN to the membership. He finally decided not to seek re-election to the NEC as he was totally disgusted with their incompetence and dishonesty.
He was later thrown out of UKIP after the odious Paul Nuttall demanded he sign a letter denying membership of UK First. Del Young was not a member but that made no difference to the disgusting Nuttall.
Del Young is a man of decency. Such a man has no place in Farage's UKIP.
Taken from Dr Edmond's blog.
For the record, and with Del's agreement I publish below an email Del sent to John Whitaker copy to the whole NEC concerning John West's treatment by UKIP. It speaks for itself.
Date: Saturday, 26 July, 2008, 16:52
Saturday 26 July 2008
Dear Mr. Whitaker,
First of all let me say that I can sympathise with the fact that a stupid, selfish and destructive action concerning the posting of John West’s MEP media interview on YouTube by Annabelle Fuller has put you in a difficult position.
When the actions of others put us in difficult positions it can be highly frustrating, however given the circumstantial evidence that there is a 99% chance that this video was indeed posted by Miss Fuller, from your email I get the impression that you have not spoken to Miss Fuller indepth regarding this matter.
Instead you have chosen to email the National Executive of the party a fanciful story from Miss Fuller, which is hugely insulting to what little intelligence I possess.
Not only is it damaging to Mr. West that this video has been leaked, it is potentially far more damaging to the party that this video and Miss Fullers Comments – “UKIP are the Eurosceptic nutters” etc. - have ended up in the public domain, and indeed I believe it was posted for a time on the BNP website for god’s sake.
The leader and his disciples have always accused innocent hard working activists of doing things to damage the party and yet one of his most protected confidants has done immense damage to the party with her vengeful, spiteful actions.
As the Chairman of the party and NEC, your first loyalty should be to the best interests of the party and the cause for which we fight, but increasingly over the years you and the majority of NEC members seem to have put loyalty to the leader ahead of the interests of the members, the party and our cause.
As an NEC member I have a duty to work with the elected leader of the party to take our cause forward, but I do not owe that duty blindly and unquestioningly – I have to balance what help or support I give to our leader with the best interests of the party, its members and our objectives.
It has been an open secret within the party that Miss Fuller was under the protection of the party leader and that is why on many occasions Miss Fuller has written things on internet forums that were hugely offensive to members, including certain NEC members and yet no action has ever been taken against her.
Indeed there was a particular series of postings on an internet forum regarding Tom Wise & Roger Knapman a year or two ago by an individual and Miss Fuller which caused some concern to me in so much that this individual and Miss Fuller must have had first hand and unrestricted knowledge of the matter.
At that time I raised my concerns to the NEC and they were minuted regarding persons in the press office having access to information of a sensitive nature and not handling it with confidentiality and care.
I later found out that the person in question was Miss Fullers partner and I was assured by Clive Page that Miss Fuller would not make any future postings and that she had been warned about her behaviour.
Yet after a couple of months Miss Fuller was once again posting on Internet forums commenting in ways unbecoming of a professional member of this party.
Indeed she stated on the Independence and Democracy forum that she is not answerable to the party, instead claiming that she reported to someone in the European parliament and yet it seems she has open licence to abuse UKIP’s name, members and NEC.
If Miss Fuller chooses to resign from whatever positions she holds or indeed from the party before a disciplinary hearing can be arranged, if that is deemed appropriate, there is little that you can do.
However I still believe you should have had a meeting with Miss Fuller to establish all the facts in this matter and prepared a report for the NEC to consider, at the specially convened meeting Eric Edmonds requested and any response to the wider members then agreed by the NEC, instead of this Hollywood fantasy involving a taxi driver and a mysterious computer specialist - I did not realise Stephen Spielberg had joined the party!
Miss Fuller’s actions have left the party with a potentially very large can of legal worms and a high risk of financial liability, I understand that Mr. West has now engaged lawyers and intends to sue the party, as it was UKIP that was responsible under the data protection act and not Miss Fuller.
I would also like to point out that all members of the NEC are liable and responsible for any financial liabilities of the party.
I also believe that the police will be interviewing Mr. West in the near future with a view to launching an investigation and that the information commissioner to whom this matter has been reported may also conduct an investigation, which may lead to the party receiving a sizeable fine.
So you see Mr. Whitaker, Miss Fuller may have walked off into the sunset, whilst we are left to face the music and the possibility of picking up a number of huge bills and your email has done very little to help matters and gives the impression we are running for political numpties of the year award (hotly contested with Gordon Brown I believe).
I suspect that this may not be the last we see of Miss Fuller with regards to UKIP and the InDem group and their activities, I rather suspect that she will be employed by someone connected to UKIP or as a consultant in the 2009 campaign and hence again given the right to apparently speak on behalf of the party.
What has happened to Mr. West has been totally hurtful, unprofessional and hugely unacceptable on all levels, however sometimes we cannot control what happens to us, but we can manage the effects of what happens to us.
As an NEC member I want to work with you and the other members of the NEC in managing this very fine mess once again, created by someone under the protection of the party leader.
Firstly I would respectfully suggest that you write a letter on behalf of yourself and the NEC unreservedly apologising to Mr. West and call an extraordinary NEC meeting as requested by Eric Edmonds so that we can work through and manage where possible, repair where we can, apologise where we must and ensure that the party does not find itself in this position again.
There is an increasingly distasteful pattern appearing in the party, that when party members raise concerns or lodge complaints, they are treated with disdain, contempt and viciousness and in some cases are openly attacked or have lies told about them.
There also seems to be a general refusal to investigate complaints, which in turn leads to further dissatisfaction and trouble that could have been avoided in the first place.
Dr. David Abbott stressed at the NEC meeting in July that we really need to investigate John West’s and others complaints, because failure to do so upsets the activists and rubs the members up the wrong way, sadly his request as per usual appears to have fallen on deaf ears.
Mr. Whitaker you are a very intelligent man and I know you are better than this.
Loyalty to our leader is admirable and should be encouraged, but that loyalty cannot take precedence over the interests of the members and our cause, if the leader is hell-bent on taking us down a very narrow political dead end, there is no good to come from us ignoring the signs and pretending that we cannot see the dangers that lie ahead – it is our duty to advise the leader that he must change direction – this is not disloyal, this is common sense.
At the NEC meeting in June I tried to point out to our leader some of things he needs to change and some of the things that he needs to change, including certain personnel, to get the party back on the right road but this also fell on deaf ears.
We need to have a clear functional and effective strategy, working closely with our branches and our activists in moving forward and growing the party, as our hardest task is to educate the British people on the dangers of the Political EU.
Simply concentrating on returning as many MEP’s as possible in 2009, whilst maybe being admirable and right is not a wholesale or effective strategy for achieving what we must achieve in the UK .
One does not have to like the messenger, but it does help on the odd occasion to listen to the message.
Please call an extraordinary NEC meeting for early in August so that as an NEC we can ask the relevant questions and uniformly manage this mess.
The NEC needs to get back and manage this party as laid down in the constitution, as there are far too many individuals or little groups who are unaccountable to the NEC and yet are making decisions or taking actions whilst being given licence and protection by the leader to use UKIP’s name, sometimes causing damage to the party’s name or members, whilst the NEC is responsible and liable for any recriminations.
It is time for us to stop being the see no evil, hear no evil, but do much evil club.
I have no doubt I will be branded mal-content or trouble maker etc. as usual, however I can assure you that I have just one agenda, and that is to save this country from the political EU and to make this party as strong and effective as it can be to achieve that aim.
We note that the usual idiots in UKIP are claiming a surge in membership since the Euro elections.
So would they care to explain why our contact in UKIP HQ has confirmed to us that they have been inundated with resignations?
This follows the revelation that Farage was prepared to disband UKIP if the Tories promised a referendum on the EU.
Several UKIP PPC’s have also resigned in disgust. This includes at least three in the SE.
Mike Mendoza - pictured above - is one of the better known candidates. Mike's reasons for leaving are somewhat different. He hates Pearson but still loves Farage! There is one born every minute!
The Conservative candidate in Hove, Mike Weatherley, has received a big boost today by the defection of his UKIP opponent, Mike Mendoza to the Conservative Party.
Mendoza - who has hosted shows on a number of talk radio stations over the years - is in fact a former Conservative councillor in Brighton and Hove. However, he left the party a few years ago and has since stood for UKIP as a candidate for West Sussex County Council and Brighton and Hove Council, and was set to stand in Hove at the general election.
He explained his decision thus:
"After talking to both Mike Weatherley and Tim Loughton [MP for Worthing East and Shoreham where he lives], I realised that they both had the same ideals as me and it would be ridiculous for me to stand against either of them. We have to work together as hard as possible to rid ourselves of this discredited Labour Government.
"I am also totally disillusioned with the way UKIP has developed over the past year and I am very disappointed with the choice of new leader. Nigel Farage will be a very difficult act to follow and without him at the helm UKIP will inevitably lose a lot of credibility.
"I am now going to rejoin the Conservative Party, where I believe I can make suggestions and those suggestions will be listened to. It is far better to be within the Conservative Party trying to make a real difference and only the Conservatives offer any realistic prospect of rowing back from the unashamed federalist European agenda with which this Labour Government have been complicit and which the vast majority of people in Britain do not want.
"I was very impressed with Tim Loughton’s views and will support him in every way I can for the future as my MP. I have always considered Tim a very hard working MP and would not want to do anything to stop him carrying on the great work he has started and achieved so far. Mike Weatherley also has my full support and I have every confidence that he will make a first class MP for Hove."
We also note that Paula Songhurst - Derek Clark’s secretary and assistant - has resigned.
Derek Clark is currently under investigation by OLAF. The allegations concern misuse of EU funds. OLAF is set to make a decision on whether to pass their file on him to the British police. Is it just a coincidence that Ms Songhurst has picked this time to resign?
Derek Clark OLAF Case Number: D/007/033/04.09.08
Derek Clark OLAF Investigation Number: DD/FD- D2008.A1/7133/OF/2008/0240
IPSWICH: A former UKIP activist has won a civil action against the party for a breach of confidence involving the video sharing website YouTube.
John West, of Spring Lane in Wickham Market, had sought £5,000 for an alleged breach of confidence over the use of a mock television interview.
Finding for Mr West, District Judge Bazley White ordered UKIP to pay him £50, while a second action against Annabelle Fuller, a former party press officer, was dismissed.
In documents presented to Ipswich County Court, Mr West said that as part of the process for selecting candidates to fight the European elections, he participated in a mock TV interview in May 2008, designed to test his aptitude for facing the media.
He claimed he was told before the interview took place that the recording would only be seen by the regional interview panel to determine the shortlist from which the regional membership would then select the candidates by postal ballot.
Mr West said: “On July 18, 2008, a copy of the interview was posted on the YouTube internet site with the following script: 'Watch this guy! He wants to stand as an MEP for UKIP, the anti Europe nutters … I wonder if they pick him!!!'.”
Mr West, who at the 2005 General Election contested North Ipswich and Central Suffolk for the party, said after the hearing that he had tried to resolve the matter amicably with party leader Nigel Farage.
“UKIP only has itself to blame for this ruling,” said Mr West, who is now a member of the United Kingdom First Party.
A spokesman for UKIP said: “We accept the decision of the judge and the Information Commissioner, who felt that the technical data, though on a password protected laptop, should also have been encrypted.
“We believe that the £50 judgement from an original claim of £5,000 is a reasonable punishment for our lapse.”
Farage has now threatened Batten with a charge of bringing the party into disrepute. If found guilty he could find himself thrown out of UKIP.
We feel that Farage lacks the courage to carry out the threat. He may be stupid but he is not that stupid. He knows that any attempt to remove Batten would split the party down the middle. The resulting bad publicity would also seriously damage what little reputation UKIP has left.
Gerard Batten is reported to be unconcerned by Farage’s threat. Tim - Gerard's biggest fan and author of the unforgettable 'Vote Gerard Batten' blog - was unavailable for comment.
I am extremely pleased that Ipswich County Court has ruled in my favour and found UKIP guilty of a breach of confidence. This ruling concerns the posting of my MEP mock television interview on the YouTube website.
The Judge ruled that I had every right to expect the interview to remain confidential. He also ruled that UKIP’s defence - that the video was posted without their knowledge - was no defence as they had a clear duty to protect my confidential data.
Peter Reeve and Jonathan Arnott represented UKIP during the hearing. Both failed to provide a coherent defence. It is no surprise that their attempts to exonerate UKIP were rejected by the Judge.
UKIP only has itself to blame for this ruling.
All my attempts to deal with this matter amicably were constantly rejected by both Nigel Farage and John Whittaker.
At the time of the incident Dr Eric Edmond, Del Young and Dr David Abbott all tried to raise this issue with UKIP’s NEC. Their efforts were rejected by their fellow NEC members. As was mine when I attended an NEC meeting to request an apology only to be abused by several of the disreputable individuals on the NEC unfit for leadership of anything let alone what might have been a great political movement to lead Britain out of the EU, which has sadly collapsed due to this and similar dishonourable behaviour.
I would like to publicly thank these three individuals for their support at the time.
To this day I have yet to receive a full apology from ANY member of UKIP’s leadership.
The only people to come out of this badly are Nigel Farage, Annabelle Fuller, John Whittaker and UKIP’s NEC.
Annabelle Fuller lost her job with UKIP after the posting of my video.
UKIP’s image has also been thoroughly tainted by this and other serious issues concerning the lack of probity within the party. Earlier this year UKIP lost out on a donation of £1.2 million after the potential donor was made aware of various allegations of dirty tricks and corruption within UKIP. This included the YouTube incident.
I am relieved to have been vindicated. Justice has been seen to be done.
I would like to thank all those people who have supported me over this issue. There are far too many to mention but special thanks must go to my wife, Petrina Holdsworth, the late Piers Merchant, Greg Lance-Watkins, Geoffrey Collier and Niall Warry and the Defence Fund.
I would also like to thank one of UKIP’s MEPs for their private support. I have agreed not to name them for obvious reasons.
Thank you. John West
With thanks to GLW for sending us a copy.
Congratulations to John West on winning his case. He must be commended for his determination to bring EUKIP to justice!
It was amusing to note that Farage was telling his sycophants that Mr West had no chance of winning. How stupid must he now feel. John West has been vindicated while UKIP has been humiliated. Another nail in the EUKIP coffin!
Farage and Fuller probably thought in some deluded way that they were being very clever by mocking Mr West on YouTube. If only they could have seen into the future! Look at the ultimate result!
Fuller was sacked and UKIP recently lost a potential £1.2 million donation thanks in part to their treatment of Mr West. That donation could have cleared UKIP’s legal debts AND paid for their General Election campaign.
What a pair of idiots! Farage and Fuller should go on the stage as performing seals or even exhibits in a freak show. Such is the level of their idiocy!
By all accounts little Peter Reeve and little Jonathan Arnott failed dismally to present a defence. All they could manage were feeble attempts to lie and smear. Such are the scum that rise to the top of the sceptic tank that is EUKIP!
Mark Croucher - Farage sycophant and employee of EUKIP - was all set to smear Mr West when the Judge ruled in UKIP's favour. His silence is now deafening.
Here is GLW's excellent summary of the whole sorry saga:
Ipswich County Court was the scene of another embarrassment for EUkip today in a case which has been bubbling under for a long time and which has done the party a great deal of harm as its profile has been greatly raised by Mark Croucher in an endless thread on what was The UKIP Forum until EUkip placed itself firmly in the gutter with an endless and vile thread desperately and dishonestly trying to pretend Niall Warry, Geoffrey Collier & Dr. Eric Edmond were in some tenuous way dishonest - a typical example of EUkip's gutter politics.
Deliberately I have held back on publishing this news as I wished to see just how long it would take before EUkip came out with some sort of denigratory spin against the Courts and the Judge who found them Guilty and in what way they lied to imply they had been exhonourated by being found guilty. My uninvolved witness in The Court phoned me on his mobile shortly after 15.30 hrs. with the details, but now at 19.30hrs. EUkip still haven't managed to invent a spin so here are the facts.
During the corrupt procedure for appointing the liar and cheat Bannerman at the top of the list of candidates in the Eastern Region EUkip's crew of filth deliberately leaked a confidential internal training practice video onto YouTube - the leak was carried out by one of Farage's doxies Annabelle Fuller who posted it on YouTube under the title of 'How Not To Do Politics' this foul mouthed deficient would not, in my opinion, have acted in this way had she not been carrying out the wishes of Farage.
Annabelle Fuller even invented a pack of lies to try to cover for EUkip but finally although EUkip's corrupt leadership made a pretence of believing the lies Annabelle Fuller was announced as sacked by John Wittacker an issue he found so repugnant that he himself resigned as chairman and Farage's errand boy.
Finally today in Ipswich County Court John West was totally vindicated.
Peter Reeve and Jonathan Arnott were made to look the shifty little nebishes they most clearly are by the Court. They were like small boys in front of the head master with Reeve trying to use every irrelevant comment he could think of.
The Judge lambasted them not just for their failure to protect data but for trying to pass the blame to an individual when it was clearly EUkip's duty to act responsibly. The Judge also criticised them for having made no attempt at a plausible defence or at least bringing a Solicitor to represent them as he was clearly annoyed at their childish comments in the Court. Their excuse was that EUkip's legal adviser Michael Zucherman had told them that they weren't allowed a solicitor in a small Claims Court to which the Judge firmly responded 'what rubbish, that is ridiculous and you say he is a solicitor'!
The case commenced at 14:00hrs. and EUkip's legal team even threatened John West in Court saying that if they had wanted to damage him they would have done more, thereby admitting they had actually been party to this offence! John West asked what they would have done additionally as he had only ever tried to strengthen and support EUkip and there was nothing they could have 'on him'.
Little Jonathan Arnott even tried to claim that John West had had meetings with the BNP, which was proved to be a lie and the best evidence they could lead was a photograph taken by that egregious piece of filth the low life and liar Michael McGough at the EU election count of John West chatting with the Libertas candidate and what seems to be a chum of McGough's standing alone and making a victory sign for McGough, the supposed evidence was so irrelevant the Judge just ignored Arnott who sheepishly hid it away in his folder, realising he had again made a fool of himself and EUkip - Just how low will these scum sink?
Peter Reeve & Jonathan Arnott increasingly aware that not only were EUkip clearly in the wrong but that they had made the situation increasingly worse as they stood there like startled rabbits in the headlights and when the Judge finally called a halt to the procedings they were a picture with little Arnott chubby and childish and clearly completely out of his depth dealing with grown ups on his own and Peter Reeve shown yet again to be a complete inadequate as he went redder and redder - The Judge found in favour of John West finding EUkip in dereliction of their duty of care and confidentiality and guilty of the offence as charged clearly vindicating John West and making an oblique congratulation in that he had relentlessly persued the matter.
John West was thus completely vindicated and EUkip PROVEN GUILTY and admonished accordingly, well aware that John West had merely wished for an apology and EUkip having failed to make the simplest attempt at apology the Guilty verdict was particularly valuable since West had had the backing of a considerable number of honest men and women who were disgusted at EUkip's behaviour.
Even leaving the Court Reeve & Arnott showed themselves for the ill mannered low lifes they clearly are - too ashamed of their behaviour to apologise or even concede with honour they strutter out of Court behind John West and his Father, a retired Police Officer, making derogatory comments and sneering asides - these people really are the sweepings of society, unfit for any political role but probably unfit for any other career of merit or responsibility - they just haven't a clue how to behave as grown ups and like Farage depend on sneer, smear and spin to underpin their sordid personalities.
John told me last night he really didn't expect his compensation to cover his costs but that the important factor was to clear his name of the vile lies of the likes of Croucher, Denny, McGough, Curtis, Reeve, NutAll, Agnew, Farage, and the rest of the solids that have floated to the top in EUkip's leadership septic tank.
Well done John West for making every effort you could to clean up EUkip, with honourable disregard for the vile manner in which they attacked you.
It is now 21:00hrs. and my phone has, as ever, been in melt down - I'm supporting parents in Court in the morning fighting for their children against the malign Families Courts and the lies of The SS. Also in defence of an abused wife in Edinburgh where Elaine Grossart is being attacked yet again by her sordid ex husband Spec. member and serial bully, pervert and narcissist who targets women - look him up there is a great deal on this monstrous degenerate on the internet!
Anyway - at last herewith John West's statement on todays resounding victory and he asked how he could pay off the money he had received from the defence fund that had aided him throughout but we have declined as the donations were made in good faith and he had acquitted his end of the bargain by his efforts to clean up EUkip in the intention of TRYING to make it electable, which clearly it is not in any rational or honourable way.
Any of the donors to the defence fund who are not happy with my decision made on behalf of the fund I will personally repay their contribution.
Lord Pearson was rather surprised by the recent critical newspaper articles.
In the Lords he said:
'the subsequent media attention came as quite a shock to the system at my age'.
He would be even more surprised if knew who was behind the leaks - a member of UKIP's press office!
Some of his fellow lords were quite amused by Malcolm's offer to disband UKIP. They were even more amused by his attempts to rewrite UKIP history.
According to the Farage approved version it was all a cunning plan to expose the Tories as supporters of the EU!
So tell us something that we didn't know!
So why was Lord Pearson upset that the offer had been rejected? And why was he angry when he discovered that the offer had been leaked to the press?
“We made that offer but we didn’t get an answer. I’m so angry with them now.”
But why be angry? According to the latest UKIP spin the Tories fell for Nigel's cunning plan. Lord Pearson should have been pleased.
And remember Pearson's statement to the BBC?
"We offered that if we got a clear, written promise with an agreed wording for a referendum on whether we stayed in or left the European Union... then we would stand down for the general election, providing we had this absolutely clearly in writing.
"And then when we had the referendum - which we believed we would win - we would then be out of the European Union and then at that point UKIP, well it would have been up to UKIP, but it would probably have disbandedbecause its major point would no longer be in existence."
How strange? No mention of making the offer in order to expose Cameron's support for the EU!
Here's a bit of advice for UKIP's new leader.
If you are going to attempt to spin your way out of trouble do try to make it sound believable !
Members of UKIP. Committed to reforming the party by exposing the corruption and dishonesty that lies at its heart.
Only by removing Nigel Farage and his sycophants on the NEC can we save UKIP from electoral oblivion.