On Friday 13th the NEC decided to remove Dr Edmond as an MEP candidate. I should point out that Dr Edmond was not informed that he was to be on the NEC’s agenda.Naturally he was not given the opportunity to defend himself.
The South West Committee was not informed of the NEC’s decision.
The following day Nigel Farage travelled to Lexdrum House to meet the South West Committee.
Those present included:
Jeff Mager
Malcolm Wood
David Bendall
Trevor Colman
Elizabeth Burton
Graham Booth
Malcolm Wood
David Bendall
Trevor Colman
Elizabeth Burton
Graham Booth
It was pointed out in a letter signed by Piers Merchant and Roger Knapman that the meeting was unlawful as the committee members had not been given the designated 21 days notice. As you can imagine Farage became extremely agitated after seeing this letter!
The purpose of the meeting was to de-select Dr Edmond as an MEP candidate. However, this could not be done as the meeting had not been properly constituted.
Farage was then forced to admit that the NEC had already decided to remove Dr Edmond from the MEP list. The committee was less than impressed with this revelation and pointed out to a now agitated Farage that any decision to remove Dr Edmond should have been left to them as they represented the people who had originally selected him.
Farage then accused Dr Edmond of disrupting several NEC meetings. He also claimed that he had been removed from the NEC for reporting UKIP to the Electoral Commission.
Farage was lying.
As a member of UKIP’s NEC Dr Edmond had been jointly and severally liable for UKIP’s debts. He had simply written to the Commission AFTER his removal from the NEC informing them that he was no longer liable for any future debts.
I should add that Dr Edmond had also written to Dr Whittaker requesting details of all financial transactions made during his time on the NEC. Dr Whittaker ignored his request.
It was decided to remove Dr Edmond from the Committee. They also confirmed his removal from the MEP list. He has also been banned from holding ANY office within UKIP.
Dr Edmond is set to be thrown out of UKIP when the proposed constitutional changes are approved.
Please remember that ALL decisions made at this meeting were unlawful because it was not properly constituted. I would urge all South West members to refuse to accept the decision of this ‘committee’. They should also demand the immediate reinstatement of Dr Edmond as both an MEP candidate and a committee member.
11 comments:
'Please remember that ALL decisions made at this meeting were unlawful because it was not properly constituted. I would urge all South West members to refuse to accept the decision of this ‘committee’. They should also demand the immediate reinstatement of Dr Edmond as both an MEP candidate and a committee member.'
What complete and utter baloney and more importantly why should anyone take notice of an anonymous coward who deals in second hand stuff like his mate GLW.
There was 100% support for the expulsion both at the NEC and SW Meeting. One has to say that the names mentioned as being present shows clearly that junius is spouting lies once again.
Bob Feal-Martinez, You have been given the opportunity to provide evidence to substantiate your allegation that GLW is a racist and was involved in the suppression of black South Africans.
You have so far failed to do so. Please provide clear evidence to support these allegations. You have until 4.00PM today. Failure to do so will result in a months ban.
I note that you also deny making the suggestion that Paul Wesson had contemplated murder.
Here are your comments posted on 12 February 2009:
GLW pray tell what was this libel you speak of, are you referring to Paul Wessons own post where he talks about removing the safety catch on his service issue SLP:
"Most murderers don't go through life planning to kill people. I don't think I'll ever murder, but I remember being so upset that I had taken the safety catch off my SLP to waste a work colleague who so deserved it, and does to this day. My common sense took over from my natural inclination, but I am sure not everyone is lucky enough to regain control."
That in my book, shows the necessary mens rea, which is exactly what I pointed out. He of course didn't like that. Now I suppose junius will remove this on the grounds of potential libel whilst leaving your unedited diatribes that contain lie after lie.
End of quote. Taken from comments posted under thread 'Fasism in UKIP: Nigel Farage to raid branch funds'.
Do you still stand by these comments?
How interesting so because you now cannot counter what I have said, you now seek to change what you previously wrote:
'A message for Bob Feal-Martinez
On this blog you have accused Paul Wesson - a British Democracy Forum moderator - of contemplating murder. You have also accused Greg Lance-Watkins of racism and anti-Semitism. You went on to claim that he had been actively involved in the persecution of black South Africans.
You have failed to substantiate these allegations. If you continue to make these allegations you will be banned from posting on this blog for one month.
This will be your only warning.'
So you have now moved the goal posts, I have note repeated anything since the comments I made, and as your quote said, it was a warning. What has changed junius. I know, you have been caught out once again making things up. It is your blog, feel free to ban me, but what it shows is that you and your various Anti UKIP mates want to give it out but can't take it. That is indeed the trait of a coward.
You have been given the chance to provide proof that GLW is a racist. Please provide the proof.
You also denied making certain comments about Paul Wesson. I have now provided you with your original comments. Do you still stand by these comments or do you wish to retract them?
I am more than happy to allow you to continue posting on here as long as you can assure me that you will not repeat the allegations concerning Mr Wesson and GLW. So far you have failed to provide me with that assurance.
I await your reply.
I have merely posted what Paul Wesson wrote and gave my opinion as a former policeman. As for GLW I reserve the right to challenge the hypocrisy of the man, who frequently attacks other posters with vile, insulting posts.
Hi,
so it is clear that Bob Feal Martinez wishes to reserve the right to act normally and be a liar - unable to substantiate his lies.
He believes that it is justified for him to invent and re-itterate lies about me because I publish substantiated facts about the lies, dishonesty and corruption of his vile little clique who are so clearly destroying UKIP - none more so than himself as he endlessly drags it into the gutter where he and his dishonest, bullying chums live basing their efforts on the racist style BNP intimidation, threat, abuse, blackmail, bullying, false witness and lies.
So very EU - no wonder EUkip is so comfortable in the EU.
It is also noted that having been proven beyond any doubt that Bob Feal Martinez is a liar and unable to substantiate ANY of the lies I listed he is also too cowardly to appologise.
You bring shame on the few decent members in UKIP fool enough to support the lies of EUkip as the lesser of two evils. A disgrace to the British peoples.
Regards,
Greg L-W.
Try reading GLW rather than just post. You have insulted derided and frankly denigrated good upstanding people without one iota of truth, and yet you expect others to do differently. Well forget it chap, it ain't going to happen. You can frighten some, and brow beat others, but it doesn't work with me. Get use to it.
Hi,
The BFM stated:
Bob Feal-martinez said...
Try reading GLW rather than just post.
I did read and managed to interpret your Manglish.
I find it amusing that you make such a fool of yourself as to make such a statement on the day that you saw fit to attack John Page who had clearly put his name, on a totally unrelated issue, because you were too stupid to be able to read!
You have insulted derided and frankly denigrated good upstanding people without one iota of truth,
Please identify a single instance where I have derided and denigrated a single upstanding person, without one iota of truth.
Since you will be unable to do so I presume you will be too much of a coward and too dishonourable to apologise.
and yet you expect others to do differently.
I expect others to do as I do - act with integrity, ethically and morally, providing justification and factual support of their contentions - sadly many in EUkip being liars, cheats, bullies and corrupt act like The BNP and similar organisations. A style of dishonesty you clearly embrace and emulate.
Well forget it chap, it ain't going to happen.
I had notice - it is clear that you lack the integrity to substantiate your lies or the ethics to apologise when you are proven to have lied.
You can frighten some, and brow beat others, but it doesn't work with me.
If the truth is not of value to you and dishonesty and oaffish repetition of lies is your norm and you are too cowardly to apologise for your vile behaviour I am not surprised.
Get use to it.
'used'? - and how you have been!
Regards,
Greg L-W.
Oh dear another racist comment from GLW, 'I did read and managed to interpret your Manglish.', this is a racist slur on a country and it's people who have English as their second Language.
Hi,
Its official The BFM is an alien from planet Mangl!
Bob Feal-martinez said...
Oh dear another racist comment from GLW, 'I did read and managed to interpret your Manglish.', this is a racist slur on a country and it's people who have English as their second Language.
A land with no manners, no ethics, no integrity, no morality and endless unjustified aggression and lies, distortions and libel!
A land where cowards thrive and throw insults and run away.
What a horrid place and it looks like the people are horrid too.
Regards,
Greg L-W.
I know what will be fun . Can you two please draw up a list of people you think should be removed from UKIP ?
Post a Comment